<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; failure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegeekgiant.com/tag/failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegeekgiant.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Public Relations, Social Media and Corporate Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Embargo: Bad Execution or Bad Concept?</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeekgiant.com/2011/01/04/the-embargo-bad-execution-or-bad-concept/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thegeekgiant.com/2011/01/04/the-embargo-bad-execution-or-bad-concept/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 07:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Geek Giant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeekgiant.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Embargoes are generally more controversial than the stories they were designed to tell. They&#8217;re broken daily. Through errors by humans and machines, a post agreed to publish at 6:02 am but goes at 5:58 am. But these errors, I can&#8217;t &#8230; <a href="http://www.thegeekgiant.com/2011/01/04/the-embargo-bad-execution-or-bad-concept/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Embargoes are generally more controversial than the stories they were designed to tell. They&#8217;re broken daily. Through errors by humans and machines, a post agreed to publish at 6:02 am but goes at 5:58 am.</p>
<p>But these errors, I can&#8217;t help but wonder if they&#8217;re the result of poor execution of if the embargo is inherently flawed. As PR practitioners, we want to have a way to get our news out to as many people as possible and having journalists who agree to them is a great way to do that. Plus they <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/prnewser/media_audit/gizmodo_blogger_pr_kowtowing_to_wsjs_mossberg_should_have_ended_five_years_ago_156257.asp" target="_blank">piss off journalists</a>.</p>
<p>The challenges with embargoes are that some people <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/02/25/i-will-honor-the-embargo/">like to break them</a>, sometimes PR people <a href="http://badpitch.blogspot.com/2010/03/bad-hitler-pitch-as-if-there-was-good.html">screw them up</a> and sometimes they&#8217;re not worth the effort. But what are they inherently flawed or are we as PR practitioners simply failing to do our jobs well?</p>
<h2>In defense of the embargo</h2>
<p>Timing can be everything in the public relations world. Our clients want to see the most results possible and depending on the scope and impact of the news item an embargo is a good way to go. The clients get to spend quality time with the reporter and go in depth into the news item.</p>
<p>When the embargo lifts, you can monitor the outreach easily and pull the coverage in a more efficient manner. But I think the great thing about embargoes is that they help keep the time line of an announcement intact. If news breaks before a Web site is ready or before an executive is ready to talk about it, the perception can quickly turn negative.</p>
<h2>Proper execution</h2>
<p>I think the best thing to do is go to your list of outlets and just ask them what they want. A simple concept that rarely gets acted upon. Talk to your influencer and know what he or she wants. That conversation, regardless of the outcome, will help you down the road.</p>
<p>So, how do you properly execute an embargo?</p>
<p><strong>Plan.</strong> A proper plan makes all the difference in the world. Are you seeding exclusives? Are you looking for video? Radio? Print? How will you optimize for inbound interview requests? So many criteria can make or break an embargoed announcement.</p>
<p><strong>Research.</strong> Executing a successful embargo partly depends on who is receiving the news. Have you worked with a particular reporter before? Does he/she have a reputation for breaking them? Making a tiered list of outlets that you wish to offer pre-briefs and embaroed news to is almost as important as the news you are sharing.</p>
<p><strong>Have news.</strong> Not all press releases are created equally. Make sure the news you are trying to have released under embargo is actually newsworthy.</p>
<p><strong>Communicate.</strong> Work with the writer. Make sure they have all of the information and materials they need in order to write the best post possible for their audience. That&#8217;s the key, making sure their audience is happy.</p>
<p><strong>Monitor.</strong> Sometimes mistakes happen. Be ready for those mistakes. Post published early? Have the release ready for the wire and be ready to react.</p>
<p>As I said before, the embargo can be a valuable PR tool if utilized properly. What do you think? Let me know in the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thegeekgiant.com/2011/01/04/the-embargo-bad-execution-or-bad-concept/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laying Down the Twitter Law</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeekgiant.com/2010/02/03/laying-down-the-twitter-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thegeekgiant.com/2010/02/03/laying-down-the-twitter-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 06:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genuine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sincere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeekgiant.com/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter has fundamentally changed our lives, whether we like it or not. And people have written miles of books, blog posts and even tweets about best practices and what matters on Twitter. One of the biggest things that is almost &#8230; <a href="http://www.thegeekgiant.com/2010/02/03/laying-down-the-twitter-law/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.twitter.com/geekgiant">Twitter</a> has fundamentally changed our lives, whether we like it or not.</p>
<p>And people have written miles of books, blog posts and even tweets about best practices and what matters on Twitter. One of the biggest things that is almost universally agreed upon is to be genuine. So how do we as public relations professionals remain genuine when we&#8217;re asked to tweet about a client?</p>
<h2>The precedent</h2>
<p>Fundamentally you are free to talk about whatever the hell you want with your Twitter stream. It&#8217;s your content. It&#8217;s your copyright. It&#8217;s your reputation.</p>
<p>Your reputation? Yeah, your reputation. You put it on the line each and every time you post something to the public domain. When I hit publish on this post, I was subjecting myself to the judgment of past, present and future employers. It&#8217;s the same thing with Twitter.</p>
<p>If your precedent is to include links to client announcements or blog posts, then that&#8217;s fine. You&#8217;ve willingly shared that information. After all, without clients we wouldn&#8217;t be able to pay the electric bill so we could tweet, right? There is a conception that all posts in a social network should be neutral and objective. If you have a relationship, some feel it should be disclosed either up front or by using hash tags or other <a href="http://www.microsyntax.org/" target="_blank">microsyntax</a>. For example, <a href="http://twitter.com/monkchips" target="_blank">James Governor</a> from the analyst firm Redmonk uses &#8220;<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=Monkchips+%24client" target="_blank">$client</a>&#8221; to denote posts to his Twitter stream about his paying clients.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s a judgement call you will have to make.</p>
<p>But what about when your employer says you must tweet on a client&#8217;s behalf?</p>
<h2>Mandated tweeting</h2>
<p>I see a potential for conflict when an employer mandates that an employee tweet on its behalf. Making a choice to share the announcement of a project you&#8217;ve worked on or a blog post from a co-worker is one thing.</p>
<p>Being told what to tweet and when to tweet it is another beast. The argument is that it&#8217;s not genuine. If you don&#8217;t want to post it, then why should you be obligated to? I&#8217;m all for being a team player. But sometimes you need to protect the community and precedent you have created. I don&#8217;t know what the right answer is. So, I&#8217;m asking you.</p>
<p>How would you respond to being given a pre-written tweet and being asked to post it? Would you? Why or why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thegeekgiant.com/2010/02/03/laying-down-the-twitter-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Blogworld Means to me</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeekgiant.com/2009/09/14/what-blogworld-means-to-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thegeekgiant.com/2009/09/14/what-blogworld-means-to-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geek Giant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlogWorld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bwe09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegeekgiant.com/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have the opportunity to speak at this year&#8217;s BlogWorld and New Media Expo next month. I&#8217;ll get to the topic more in another post. But here I wanted to share a bit about what the opportunity means to me &#8230; <a href="http://www.thegeekgiant.com/2009/09/14/what-blogworld-means-to-me/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the opportunity to speak at this year&#8217;s BlogWorld and New Media Expo next month. I&#8217;ll get to the topic more in another post.</p>
<p>But here I wanted to share a bit about what the opportunity means to me personally. I have the opportunity to sit on a panel alongside <a href="http://veryofficialblog.com/about/" target="_blank">Shannon Paul</a>, <a href="http://www.intersectionofonlineandoffline.com/" target="_blank">Mark Story</a> and a special guest I&#8217;ll reveal later. For those of you that don&#8217;t know, Shannon built and implemented the social media strategy for the Detroit Red Wings and Mark is the Director of new media for the SEC.</p>
<p>I am the unknown on this panel. I am the underdog in this story.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s OK. I get to represent myself, my knowledge and my skills in front of an audience of bloggers, new media professionals and assorted Web celebrities.</p>
<h2>The bigger picture</h2>
<p>Speaking at conferences is a sort of currency in the new media world. And I am making my first deposit. I like saying that good ideas are not confined to the big names in this industry and this is my opportunity to prove it.</p>
<p>I have a few weeks to get over the nerves and prep my thoughts and get new cards made up. I have a few weeks to ponder what words I will use to describe my ideas facing the public relations industry. As I write this, Don Draper on <a href="http://www.amctv.com/originals/madmen/" target="_blank">Mad Men</a> said &#8220;Our worst fears lie in anticipation.&#8221; I think that is a fitting theme for this post.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re thinking about embarking on a new adventure, there is no time like the present to put your head down and charge into it full steam. <a href="http://learntoduck.com/" target="_blank">Fear of failing</a> is failure. If you are crippled by the possibility of what might happen, then you will never know what is possible. So, now&#8217;s the time to submit that proposal or write that post.</p>
<p>See you in Vegas…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thegeekgiant.com/2009/09/14/what-blogworld-means-to-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

